CBT and Language Portfolios

Week 13, Computer-Based Language Testing. In our class this week, we discussed the potential benefits and drawbacks of computer-based language testing (CBT). The benefits include a consistent mode of presentation (or delivery), consistent timing, no need to interpret handwriting, practicality (time, money, # of proctors necessary to hire), world-wide access, and the ability of computer adaptive tests to adjust to student abilities. Although the study by Jamieson indicated that taking computer-based language tests did not disadvantage different learner groups, some people in class had different experiences. For instance, Turkan mentioned a practical problem. It is often hard to find English keyboards in EFL settings, or, if there is an overlay representing a different script, it is often difficult to remember and often not marked on the keyboard itself. Someone else (sorry, I can't remember who or I would give them a shout-out here) mentioned that the process of English composition may be different between people who type and people who handwrite, which could put people who handwrite at a disadvantage when using a computer-based test. Another question is whether typing proficiency plays a role in successfully completing CBT writing tests. Also, is CBT practical for all language testing situations? For instance, what about basic literacy tests? Tests for refugees (some of whom may have no computer literacy)? Jena referenced an example of several African students who took the PIE placement test. Their unfamiliarity with technology threw them off, and the test process became frustrating for both the test-takers and the proctor. While the technology issues were resolved, it may have triggered a negative affective reaction. Some of these difficulties may have practical solutions, but others warrant further research. E-Portfolios. Dan Isbell presented the idea of language portfolios, and I rather like the idea. Last semester, we watched a video about the EU language portfolios, and they looked like a good way to assess a learner's progress, and to compile their accomplishments. I also think it is an interesting method to present your professional qualifications in lieu of or to supplement a CV.